Discussion:
Call for an Impeachment Inquiry of Bush and Cheney
(too old to reply)
Thomas Jefferson
2004-04-18 02:01:28 UTC
Permalink
Clinton first for Treason. Why did he allow 911?!
righter
2004-04-18 05:17:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by Thomas Jefferson
Clinton first for Treason. Why did he allow 911?!
Bush changed his name to Clinton? That's news to me.
Greg Henry
2004-04-18 10:46:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by Thomas Jefferson
Clinton first for Treason. Why did he allow 911?!
Well, let's see now. If memory serves, Clinton and Bush Jr. & Sr. are
all part of the same secret society whose aim is to have the entire
Earth run by a small elite group of filthy rich people like themselves
while the rest of us are slaves. But they know people will fight back,
so they stage events like 9/11 so that we'll all be panicked into going
along with surrendering our guns & all our rights.

....or something like that.

-g
Nitesbane
2004-04-18 13:44:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by Greg Henry
Well, let's see now. If memory serves, Clinton and Bush Jr. & Sr. are
all part of the same secret society whose aim is to have the entire
Earth run by a small elite group of filthy rich people like themselves
while the rest of us are slaves. But they know people will fight back,
so they stage events like 9/11 so that we'll all be panicked into going
along with surrendering our guns & all our rights.
....or something like that.
Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.
righter
2004-04-18 15:07:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Greg Henry
Post by Thomas Jefferson
Clinton first for Treason. Why did he allow 911?!
Well, let's see now. If memory serves, Clinton and Bush Jr. & Sr. are
all part of the same secret society whose aim is to have the entire
Earth run by a small elite group of filthy rich people like themselves
while the rest of us are slaves. But they know people will fight back,
so they stage events like 9/11 so that we'll all be panicked into going
along with surrendering our guns & all our rights.
....or something like that.
-g
It once occurred to me that Bush was in on 911, as you wrote, and I know
many of you will call me crazy (well, I am--but that's not the point!) for
saying that, but if he DID stage it, who's CRAZIER, me or HIM?
righter
2004-04-18 15:11:42 UTC
Permalink
Correction, I meant to say, It once occurred to me that Bush could've been
in on 911, etc.
Jeff George
2004-04-19 17:05:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by righter
Correction, I meant to say, It once occurred to me that Bush could've been
in on 911, etc.
You were correct the first time.

Jeff George
SLAP (Socialist Liberation Army of the People)
SLUG (Socialists for Liberty United Government)


Power to the People! Vive la revolution!
Viva La Revolucion!

Greg Henry
2004-04-18 15:27:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by righter
Post by Greg Henry
Post by Thomas Jefferson
Clinton first for Treason. Why did he allow 911?!
Well, let's see now. If memory serves, Clinton and Bush Jr. & Sr. are
all part of the same secret society whose aim is to have the entire
Earth run by a small elite group of filthy rich people like themselves
while the rest of us are slaves. But they know people will fight back,
so they stage events like 9/11 so that we'll all be panicked into going
along with surrendering our guns & all our rights.
....or something like that.
-g
It once occurred to me that Bush was in on 911, as you wrote, and I know
many of you will call me crazy (well, I am--but that's not the point!) for
saying that, but if he DID stage it, who's CRAZIER, me or HIM?
Hey, look at the crazy shit that's being done in the name of pure greed.
It's nothing new, certainly, but the extremes to which people are going
to rip others off is off the wall now.

I can almost understand all these companies off shoring jobs so they can
pay people a fraction of what they'd have to pay us to do the same job,
that's the free market. But when companies are bringing in foreigners to
this country to work cheap and making us train our replacements before
they lay us off is downright insulting. Companies are shaving time off
time cards and threatening anyone mid-level who doesn't cooperate or God
forbid blows the whistle. I mean it's a fuckin' circus out there.

There's more ethics in dealing crack.

-g
Nitesbane
2004-04-18 16:11:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Greg Henry
There's more ethics in dealing crack.
Of course there are more ethics in dealing crack. People buy crack because
they WANT crack, not because some authority figure tells them they should
do crack. Drug dealers don't have to advertise or trick anyone into buying
their products (despite the propaganda that dealers "push" their drugs onto
others). Drugs sell themselves. Unfortunately for the government, regular
citizens aren't as keen on going to war or getting laid off.

Maybe Bush should just resign and start dealing.
Jeff George
2004-04-19 17:05:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by righter
Post by Greg Henry
Post by Thomas Jefferson
Clinton first for Treason. Why did he allow 911?!
Well, let's see now. If memory serves, Clinton and Bush Jr. & Sr. are
all part of the same secret society whose aim is to have the entire
Earth run by a small elite group of filthy rich people like themselves
while the rest of us are slaves. But they know people will fight back,
so they stage events like 9/11 so that we'll all be panicked into going
along with surrendering our guns & all our rights.
....or something like that.
-g
It once occurred to me that Bush was in on 911, as you wrote, and I know
many of you will call me crazy (well, I am--but that's not the point!) for
saying that, but if he DID stage it, who's CRAZIER, me or HIM?
Him.

Jeff George
SLAP (Socialist Liberation Army of the People)
SLUG (Socialists for Liberty United Government)


Power to the People! Vive la revolution!
Viva La Revolucion!
Loading...